You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-management: One size does not fit all
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient Education & Counseling, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaap Trappenburg, Nini Jonkman, Tiny Jaarsma, Harmieke van Os-Medendorp, Helianthe Kort, Niek de Wit, Arno Hoes, Marieke Schuurmans |
| Abstract |
Self-management for people with chronic diseases is now widely recognized as an essential part of treatment. Despite the high expectations and the growing body of evidence in terms of its effectiveness, a wide application of self-management programs is inhibited due to several challenges. Worldwide, a variety of complex and multifactorial interventions have been evaluated in very heterogeneous patient populations leaving healthcare professionals in doubt about what works best and what works in whom. In this letter to the editor the authors systematically reflect on the current evidence of patient-specific determinants of success of self-management and argument the urge for increased scientific efforts to establish tailored self-management in patients with chronic disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Central African Republic | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Greece | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 20% |
| Psychology | 16 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#2,634
of 4,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,141
of 209,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#29
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.