↓ Skip to main content

Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss: comment

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss: comment
Published in
Ecology, March 2013
DOI 10.1890/12-0047.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Bock Axelsen, Uri Roll, Lewi Stone, Andrew Solow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
Spain 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 90 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 21%
Researcher 20 21%
Professor 12 12%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 49%
Environmental Science 24 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2013.
All research outputs
#16,752,019
of 24,641,327 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#5,741
of 6,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,018
of 198,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#32
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.