↓ Skip to main content

Non-Cell-Autonomous Tumor Suppression by p53

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
602 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
689 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-Cell-Autonomous Tumor Suppression by p53
Published in
Cell, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amaia Lujambio, Leila Akkari, Janelle Simon, Danielle Grace, Darjus F. Tschaharganeh, Jessica E. Bolden, Zhen Zhao, Vishal Thapar, Johanna A. Joyce, Valery Krizhanovsky, Scott W. Lowe

Abstract

The p53 tumor suppressor can restrict malignant transformation by triggering cell-autonomous programs of cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis. p53 also promotes cellular senescence, a tumor-suppressive program that involves stable cell-cycle arrest and secretion of factors that modify the tissue microenvironment. In the presence of chronic liver damage, we show that ablation of a p53-dependent senescence program in hepatic stellate cells increases liver fibrosis and cirrhosis associated with reduced survival and enhances the transformation of adjacent epithelial cells into hepatocellular carcinoma. p53-expressing senescent stellate cells release factors that skew macrophage polarization toward a tumor-inhibiting M1-state capable of attacking senescent cells in culture, whereas proliferating p53-deficient stellate cells secrete factors that stimulate polarization of macrophages into a tumor-promoting M2-state and enhance the proliferation of premalignant cells. Hence, p53 can act non-cell autonomously to suppress tumorigenesis by promoting an antitumor microenvironment, in part, through secreted factors that modulate macrophage function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 689 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 662 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 190 28%
Researcher 125 18%
Student > Master 66 10%
Student > Bachelor 54 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 7%
Other 88 13%
Unknown 120 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 209 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 182 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 3%
Chemistry 14 2%
Other 42 6%
Unknown 140 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,322,652
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#7,450
of 17,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,300
of 212,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#75
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.