Title |
Contemporary Approach to Coronary Bifurcation Lesion Treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.056 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fadi J. Sawaya, Thierry Lefèvre, Bernard Chevalier, Phillipe Garot, Thomas Hovasse, Marie-Claude Morice, Tanveer Rab, Yves Louvard |
Abstract |
Coronary bifurcations are frequent and account for approximately 20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions. Nonetheless, they remain one of the most challenging lesion subsets in interventional cardiology in terms of a lower procedural success rate and increased rates of long-term adverse cardiac events. Provisional side branch stenting should be the default approach in the majority of cases and we propose easily applicable and reproducible stepwise techniques associated with low risk of failure and complications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
Mexico | 3 | 5% |
Argentina | 2 | 3% |
Greece | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 36 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 19% |
Scientists | 8 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 26 | 16% |
Researcher | 23 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
Other | 42 | 26% |
Unknown | 27 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 58% |
Engineering | 10 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Unknown | 42 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#367,481
of 25,619,480 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#41
of 4,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,086
of 349,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#1
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,619,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.