↓ Skip to main content

Constructing the extended Haagerup planar algebra

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Mathematica, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Constructing the extended Haagerup planar algebra
Published in
Acta Mathematica, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11511-012-0081-7
Authors

Stephen Bigelow, Emily Peters, Scott Morrison, Noah Snyder

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 40%
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 50%
Physics and Astronomy 4 40%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2012.
All research outputs
#6,491,988
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Mathematica
#59
of 437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,515
of 190,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Mathematica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them