↓ Skip to main content

Continuum model of cell adhesion and migration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Biology, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Continuum model of cell adhesion and migration
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Biology, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00285-008-0179-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esa Kuusela, Wolfgang Alt

Abstract

The motility of cells crawling on a substratum has its origin in a thin cell organ called lamella. We present a 2-dimensional continuum model for the lamella dynamics of a slowly migrating cell, such as a human keratinocyte. The central components of the model are the dynamics of a viscous cytoskeleton capable to produce contractile and swelling stresses, and the formation of adhesive bonds in the plasma cell membrane between the lamella cytoskeleton and adhesion sites at the substratum. We will demonstrate that a simple mechanistic model, neglecting the complicated signaling pathways and regulation processes of a living cell, is able to capture the most prominent aspects of the lamella dynamics, such as quasi-periodic protrusions and retractions of the moving tip, retrograde flow of the cytoskeleton and the related accumulation of focal adhesion complexes in the leading edge of a migrating cell. The developed modeling framework consists of a nonlinearly coupled system of hyperbolic, parabolic and ordinary differential equations for the various molecular concentrations, two elliptic equations for cytoskeleton velocity and hydrodynamic pressure in a highly viscous two-phase flow, with appropriate boundary conditions including equalities and inequalities at the moving boundary. In order to analyse this hybrid continuum model by numerical simulations for different biophysical scenarios, we use suitable finite element and finite volume schemes on a fixed triangulation in combination with an adaptive level set method describing the free boundary dynamics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 7%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 63 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 4 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 22%
Engineering 16 21%
Physics and Astronomy 10 13%
Mathematics 7 9%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2010.
All research outputs
#20,187,333
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#539
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,151
of 83,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.