↓ Skip to main content

Blunt traumatic injuries of the lung parenchyma, pleura, thoracic wall, and intrathoracic airways: multidetector computer tomography imaging findings

Overview of attention for article published in Emergency Radiology, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Blunt traumatic injuries of the lung parenchyma, pleura, thoracic wall, and intrathoracic airways: multidetector computer tomography imaging findings
Published in
Emergency Radiology, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10140-007-0651-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo P. Sangster, Aldo González-Beicos, Alberto I. Carbo, Maureen G. Heldmann, Hassan Ibrahim, Patricia Carrascosa, Miguel Nazar, Horacio B. D’Agostino

Abstract

This pictorial review discusses multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) cases of non-vascular traumatic chest injuries, with a brief clinical and epidemiological background of each of the pathology. The purpose of this review is to familiarize the reader with common and rare imaging patterns of chest trauma and substantiate the advantages of MDCT as a screening and comprehensive technique for the evaluation of these patients. Images from a level 1 trauma center were reviewed to illustrate these pathologies. Pulmonary laceration, pulmonary hernia, and their different degrees of severity are illustrated as examples of parenchymal traumatic lesions. Pleural space abnormalities (pneumothorax and hemothorax) and associated complications are shown. Diaphragmatic rupture, fracture of the sternum, sternoclavicular dislocation, fracture of the scapula, rib fracture, and flail chest are shown as manifestations of blunt trauma to the chest wall. Finally, direct and indirect imaging findings of intrathoracic airway rupture and post-traumatic foreign bodies are depicted. The advantage of high quality reconstructions, volume rendered images, and maximal intensity projection for the detection of severe complex traumatic injuries is stressed. The limitations of the initial chest radiography and the benefits of MDCT authenticate this imaging technique as the best modality in the diagnosis of chest trauma.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 19%
Researcher 9 15%
Other 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 71%
Unspecified 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2010.
All research outputs
#20,187,333
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Radiology
#441
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,586
of 67,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Radiology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.