| Title |
Recommendations for the management of severe malaria and severe dengue in resource-limited settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-016-4602-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arjen M. Dondorp, Mai Nguyen Thi Hoang, Mervyn Mer, for the Sepsis in Resource-Limited Settings-Expert Consensus Recommendations Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and the Mahidol-Oxford Research Unit (MORU) in Bangkok, Thailand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Belgium | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,473,269
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,720
of 5,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,443
of 313,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#33
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.