↓ Skip to main content

Genetic diversity and population genetic structure of Python bivittatus in China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Forestry Research, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Genetic diversity and population genetic structure of Python bivittatus in China
Published in
Journal of Forestry Research, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11676-016-0308-0
Authors

Yubao Duan, Yingshu Wang, Suying Bai, Xiuhua Tian, Ke Rong, Jianzhang Ma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,351,881
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forestry Research
#293
of 361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,216
of 311,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forestry Research
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 361 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.