| Title |
Mutual Information-Based 3D Object Tracking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11263-007-0083-7 |
| Authors |
Giorgio Panin, Alois Knoll |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 23% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 40 | 58% |
| Engineering | 20 | 29% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,182,813
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#380
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,712
of 71,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.