↓ Skip to main content

Cancer Gene Networks

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Cancer Gene Networks'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction: Cancer Gene Networks.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Emerging Methods in Chemoproteomics with Relevance to Drug Discovery.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 ANXA7-GTPase as Tumor Suppressor: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Experimental and Study Design Considerations for Uncovering Oncometabolites.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Targeting Deubiquitinating Enzymes and Autophagy in Cancer.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Quantitative Clinical Imaging Methods for Monitoring Intratumoral Evolution.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Transcriptome and Proteome Analyses of TNFAIP8 Knockdown Cancer Cells Reveal New Insights into Molecular Determinants of Cell Survival and Tumor Progression.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Network-Oriented Approaches to Anticancer Drug Response.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Knockin in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Complete Transcriptome RNA-Seq.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Computational Methods and Correlation of Exon-skipping Events with Splicing, Transcription, and Epigenetic Factors.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Tissue Engineering Platforms to Replicate the Tumor Microenvironment of Multiple Myeloma.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 microRNA Target Prediction.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Evaluating the Delivery of Proteins to the Cytosol of Mammalian Cells.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Validation of Biomarker Proteins Using Reverse Capture Protein Microarrays.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Chemical Synthesis of Activity-Based Diubiquitin Probes.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Profiling the Dual Enzymatic Activities of the Serine/Threonine Kinase IRE1α.
Attention for Chapter 10: Complete Transcriptome RNA-Seq.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Complete Transcriptome RNA-Seq.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Cancer Gene Networks
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6539-7_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6537-3, 978-1-4939-6539-7
Authors

David F. B. Miller, Pearlly Yan, Fang Fang, Aaron Buechlein, Karl Kroll, David Frankhouser, Cameron Stump, Paige Stump, James B. Ford, Haixu Tang, Scott Michaels, Daniela Matei, Tim H. Huang, Jeremy Chien, Yunlong Liu, Douglas B. Rusch, Kenneth P. Nephew

Editors

Usha Kasid, Robert Clarke

Abstract

RNA-Seq is the leading technology for analyzing gene expression on a global scale across a broad spectrum of sample types. However, due to chemical modifications by fixation or degradation due to collection methods, samples often contain an abundance of RNA that is no longer intact, and the capability of current RNA-Seq protocols to accurately quantify such samples is often limited. We have developed an RNA-Seq protocol to address these key issues as well as quantify gene expression from the whole transcriptome. Furthermore, for compatibility with improved sequencing platforms, we use restructured adapter sequences to generate libraries for Illumina HiSeq, MiSeq, and NextSeq platforms. Our protocol utilizes duplex-specific nuclease (DSN) to remove abundant ribosomal RNA sequences while retaining other types of RNA for superior transcriptome profiling from low quantity input. We employ the Illumina sequencing platform, but this method is described in sufficient detail to adapt to other platforms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,765,089
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,616
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,738
of 420,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#183
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.