↓ Skip to main content

Chronic cranberry juice consumption restores cholesterol profiles and improves endothelial function in ovariectomized rats

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Chronic cranberry juice consumption restores cholesterol profiles and improves endothelial function in ovariectomized rats
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00394-012-0425-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lai-Ming Yung, Xiao Yu Tian, Wing Tak Wong, Fung Ping Leung, Lai Hang Yung, Zhen Yu Chen, Chi Wai Lau, Paul M. Vanhoutte, Xiaoqiang Yao, Yu Huang

Abstract

Postmenopausal women experience higher risks for cardiovascular diseases than age-matched men and pre-menopausal women. There is a need for better treatment strategy for estrogen-deficient-related cardiovascular complications. We and others have recently reported that activated renin-angiotensin system and the associated oxidative stress impaired endothelium-dependent relaxation in ovariectomized rat, while angiotensin receptor blocker rescues endothelial dysfunction. Dietary supplements and lifestyle modifications provide an alternative way to improve cardiovascular health. The present study tests the hypothesis that chronic cranberry juice consumption improves cholesterol profiles and vascular functions in estrogen-deficient animal model. The effect of cranberry consumption on expression and activity of renin-angiotensin system in the vasculature will be determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 72 51%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Master 6 4%
Researcher 4 3%
Student > Postgraduate 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 40 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 37 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Chemistry 7 5%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 42 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,562,879
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#403
of 2,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,885
of 164,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#9
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.