↓ Skip to main content

Enrichment of Cryoconite Hole Anaerobes: Implications for the Subglacial Microbiome

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Enrichment of Cryoconite Hole Anaerobes: Implications for the Subglacial Microbiome
Published in
Microbial Ecology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00248-016-0886-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marek K. Zdanowski, Albert Bogdanowicz, Jan Gawor, Robert Gromadka, Dorota Wolicka, Jakub Grzesiak

Abstract

Glaciers have recently been recognized as ecosystems comprised of several distinct habitats: a sunlit and oxygenated glacial surface, glacial ice, and a dark, mostly anoxic glacial bed. Surface meltwaters annually flood the subglacial sediments by means of drainage channels. Glacial surfaces host aquatic microhabitats called cryoconite holes, regarded as "hot spots" of microbial abundance and activity, largely contributing to the meltwaters' bacterial diversity. This study presents an investigation of cryoconite hole anaerobes and discusses their possible impact on subglacial microbial communities, combining 16S rRNA gene fragment amplicon sequencing and the traditional enrichment culture technique. Cryoconite hole sediment harbored bacteria belonging mainly to the Proteobacteria (21%), Bacteroidetes (16%), Actinobacteria (14%), and Planctomycetes (6%) phyla. An 8-week incubation of those sediments in Postgate C medium for sulfate reducers in airtight bottles, emulating subglacial conditions, eliminated a great majority of dominant taxa, leading to enrichment of the Firmicutes (62%), Proteobacteria (14%), and Bacteroidetes (13%), which consisted of anaerobic genera like Clostridium, Psychrosinus, Paludibacter, and Acetobacterium. Enrichment of Pseudomonas spp. also occurred, suggesting it played a role as a dominant oxygen scavenger, providing a possible scenario for anaerobic niche establishment in subglacial habitats. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to provide insight into the diversity of the anaerobic part of the cryoconite hole microbial community and its potential to contribute to matter turnover in anoxic, subglacial sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Estonia 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Researcher 11 19%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,431,807
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#252
of 2,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,863
of 318,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#12
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.