↓ Skip to main content

Dissecting the genotype in syndromic intellectual disability using whole exome sequencing in addition to genome-wide copy number analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Dissecting the genotype in syndromic intellectual disability using whole exome sequencing in addition to genome-wide copy number analysis
Published in
Human Genetics, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00439-013-1296-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl Friedrich Classen, Vera Riehmer, Christina Landwehr, Anne Kosfeld, Stefanie Heilmann, Caroline Scholz, Sarah Kabisch, Hartmut Engels, Sascha Tierling, Miroslav Zivicnjak, Frank Schacherer, Dieter Haffner, Ruthild G. Weber

Abstract

When a known microimbalance affecting multiple genes is detected in a patient with syndromic intellectual disability, it is usually presumed causative for all observed features. Whole exome sequencing (WES) allows questioning this assumption. In this study of three families with children affected by unexplained syndromic intellectual disability, genome-wide copy number and subsequent analyses revealed a de novo maternal 1.1 Mb microdeletion in the 14q32 imprinted region causing a paternal UPD(14)-like phenotype, and two inherited 22q11.21 microduplications of 2.5 or 2.8 Mb. In patient 1 carrying the 14q32 microdeletion, tall stature and renal malformation were unexplained by paternal UPD(14), and there was no altered DLK1 expression or unexpected methylation status. By WES and filtering with a mining tool, a novel FBN1 missense variant was found in patient 1 and his mother, who both showed clinical features of Marfan syndrome by thorough anthropometric assessment, and a novel EYA1 missense variant as a probable cause of the renal malformation in the patient. In patient 2 with the 22q11.21 microduplication syndrome, skin hypo- and hyperpigmentation and two malignancies were only partially explained. By WES, compound heterozygous BLM stop founder mutations were detected causing Bloom syndrome. In male patient 3 carrying a 22q11.21 microduplication inherited from his unaffected father, WES identified a novel missense variant in the OPHN1 X-linked intellectual disability gene inherited from the unaffected mother as a possible additional cause for developmental delay. Thus, WES seems warranted in patients carrying microdeletions or microduplications, who have unexplained clinical features or microimbalances inherited from an unaffected parent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Researcher 10 17%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Computer Science 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,041,012
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#395
of 2,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,570
of 200,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.