You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing the Evolutionary Impact of Amino Acid Mutations in the Human Genome
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Genetics, May 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000083 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam R. Boyko, Scott H. Williamson, Amit R. Indap, Jeremiah D. Degenhardt, Ryan D. Hernandez, Kirk E. Lohmueller, Mark D. Adams, Steffen Schmidt, John J. Sninsky, Shamil R. Sunyaev, Thomas J. White, Rasmus Nielsen, Andrew G. Clark, Carlos D. Bustamante |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 33 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
Germany | 5 | 1% |
Brazil | 5 | 1% |
Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 1% |
Unknown | 424 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 132 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 123 | 25% |
Student > Master | 40 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 31 | 6% |
Professor | 27 | 6% |
Other | 77 | 16% |
Unknown | 57 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 260 | 53% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 88 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 3% |
Computer Science | 16 | 3% |
Mathematics | 13 | 3% |
Other | 34 | 7% |
Unknown | 59 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,795,813
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#1,404
of 8,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,629
of 99,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.