↓ Skip to main content

Juvenile Huntington's disease: a population-based study using the General Practice Research Database

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Juvenile Huntington's disease: a population-based study using the General Practice Research Database
Published in
BMJ Open, April 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Douglas, Stephen Evans, Michael D Rawlins, Liam Smeeth, Sarah J Tabrizi, Nancy S Wexler

Abstract

The juvenile form of Huntington's disease (HD) is a rare disorder. There are no population-based estimates of either its incidence or prevalence in any population in the world. The present study was undertaken to estimate the frequency of juvenile HD in the UK and to examine the range of pharmacological treatments used in its management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#15,651
of 25,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,305
of 212,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#158
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.