↓ Skip to main content

Allergens and molecular diagnostics of shellfish allergy

Overview of attention for article published in Allergo Journal International, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Allergens and molecular diagnostics of shellfish allergy
Published in
Allergo Journal International, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40629-016-0124-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas L. Lopata, Jörg Kleine-Tebbe, Sandip D. Kamath

Abstract

Shellfish belongs to "The Big 8" food groups causing allergy, which often does not outgrow during childhood. Shellfish is one of the main food allergens in adults and constitutes a diverse group of species subdivided into crustaceans and mollusks, which seem to include similar but also different allergens. Several pan-allergens are characterized in detail, including tropomyosin and arginine kinase, responsible for clinical cross-reactivity with other invertebrate allergen sources, embracing mites, insects, and parasites. Currently, at least seven different shellfish allergens have been identified, mostly from crustaceans. However, only three recombinant allergens are available for IgE-based routine diagnostic, including tropomyosin, arginine kinase, and sarcoplasmic Ca(2+)-binding protein. Other allergens include myosin light chain, troponin C, triosephosphate isomerase, and actin. This review summarizes the current advances on the molecular characterization of shellfish allergens, clinical cross-reactivity, and current diagnostic approaches for the management of this life-threatening disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 17 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 19 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,554,784
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Allergo Journal International
#13
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,313
of 318,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergo Journal International
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them