↓ Skip to main content

The Pathways Model as Harm Minimization for Youth Gamblers in Educational Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
The Pathways Model as Harm Minimization for Youth Gamblers in Educational Settings
Published in
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, February 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:casw.0000012347.61618.f7
Authors

Lia Nower, Alex Blaszczynski

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 7%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 47%
Social Sciences 5 17%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal
#223
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,696
of 148,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.