↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Physiology in the Development of Golf Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Physiology in the Development of Golf Performance
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/11532920-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark F. Smith

Abstract

The attainment of consistent high performance in golf requires effective physical conditioning that is carefully designed and monitored in accordance with the on-course demands the player will encounter. Appreciating the role that physiology plays in the attainment of consistent performance, and how a player's physicality can inhibit performance progression, supports the notion that the application of physiology is fundamental for any player wishing to excel in golf. With cardiorespiratory, metabolic, hormonal, musculoskeletal and nutritional demands acting on the golfer within and between rounds, effective physical screening of a player will ensure physiological and anatomical deficiencies that may influence performance are highlighted. The application of appropriate golf-specific assessment methods will ensure that physical attributes that have a direct effect on golf performance can be measured reliably and accurately. With the physical development of golf performance being achieved through a process of conditioning with the purpose of inducing changes in structural and metabolic functions, training must focus on foundation whole-body fitness and golf-specific functional strength and flexibility activities. For long-term player improvement to be effective, comprehensive monitoring will ensure the player reaches an optimal physical state at predetermined times in the competitive season. Through continual assessment of a player's physical attributes, training effectiveness and suitability, and the associated adaptive responses, key physical factors that may impact most on performance success can be determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 165 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 20%
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Lecturer 12 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 78 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Psychology 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 33 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,611
of 2,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,651
of 192,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#695
of 831 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 831 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.