↓ Skip to main content

Pathways to Recovery from Gambling Problems: Follow-Up from a General Population Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Pathways to Recovery from Gambling Problems: Follow-Up from a General Population Survey
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, June 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1022237807310
Authors

David C. Hodgins, Harold Wynne, Karyn Makarchuk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 50%
Social Sciences 3 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,437,515
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#386
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,379
of 35,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them