You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Unterscheider, Sean Daly, Michael Patrick Geary, Mairead Mary Kennelly, Fionnuala Mary McAuliffe, Keelin O'Donoghue, Alyson Hunter, John Joseph Morrison, Gerard Burke, Patrick Dicker, Elizabeth Catherine Tully, Fergal Desmond Malone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Turkey | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 415 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 10% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Other | 115 | 27% |
| Unknown | 87 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 254 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 7% |
| Unknown | 107 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,949,373
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#4,121
of 13,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,760
of 215,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#29
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.