| Title |
The NODS–CLiP: A Rapid Screen for Adult Pathological and Problem Gambling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10899-009-9135-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marianna Toce-Gerstein, Dean R. Gerstein, Rachel A. Volberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#419
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,899
of 127,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.