↓ Skip to main content

Beyond the Margins: Reflective Writing and Development of Reflective Capacity in Medical Education

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
Title
Beyond the Margins: Reflective Writing and Development of Reflective Capacity in Medical Education
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1347-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hedy S. Wald, Shmuel P. Reis

Abstract

Reflective capacity has been described as an essential characteristic of professionally competent clinical practice, core to ACGME competencies. Reflection has been recently linked to promoting effective use of feedback in medical education and associated with improved diagnostic accuracy, suggesting promising outcomes. There has been a proliferation of reflective writing pedagogy within medical education to foster development of reflective capacity, extend empathy with deepened understanding of patients' experience of illness, and promote practitioner well-being. At Alpert Med, "interactive" reflective writing with guided individualized feedback from interdisciplinary faculty to students' reflective writing has been implemented in a Doctoring course and Family Medicine clerkship as an educational method to achieve these aims. Such initiatives, however, raise fundamental questions of reflection definition, program design, efficacy of methods, and outcomes assessment. Within this article, we consider opportunities and challenges associated with implementation of reflective writing curricula for promotion of reflective capacity within medical education. We reflect upon reflection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 359 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Other 28 8%
Student > Postgraduate 27 7%
Other 118 32%
Unknown 70 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 40%
Social Sciences 42 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 7%
Psychology 11 3%
Arts and Humanities 10 3%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 88 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,149,989
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#937
of 8,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,508
of 103,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.