You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isolation predicts compositional change after discrete disturbances in a global meta‐study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecography, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ecog.02383 |
| Authors |
Nancy Shackelford, Brian M. Starzomski, Natasha C. Banning, Loretta L. Battaglia, Alistair Becker, Peter J. Bellingham, Brandon Bestelmeyer, Jane A. Catford, John M. Dwyer, Mats Dynesius, James Gilmour, Lauren M. Hallett, Richard J. Hobbs, Jodi Price, Takehiro Sasaki, Edmund V. J. Tanner, Rachel J. Standish |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 15% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 54% |
| Scientists | 18 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 27% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,139,805
of 25,240,298 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#304
of 2,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,122
of 429,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,240,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.