↓ Skip to main content

Sustained cortical and subcortical neuromodulation induced by electrical tongue stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Sustained cortical and subcortical neuromodulation induced by electrical tongue stimulation
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11682-010-9099-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph C. Wildenberg, Mitchell E. Tyler, Yuri P. Danilov, Kurt A. Kaczmarek, Mary E. Meyerand

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to show that information-free stimulation of the tongue can improve behavioral measures and induce sustained neuromodulation of the balance-processing network in individuals with balance dysfunction. Twelve balance-impaired subjects received one week of cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation (CN-NINM). Before and after the week of stimulation, postural sway and fMRI activation were measured to monitor susceptibility to optic flow. Nine normal controls also underwent the postural sway and fMRI tests but did not receive CN-NINM. Results showed that before CN-NINM balance-impaired subjects swayed more than normal controls as expected (p ≤ 0.05), and that overall sway and susceptibility to optic flow decreased after CN-NINM (p ≤ 0.005 & p ≤ 0.05). fMRI showed upregulation of visual sensitivity to optic flow in balance-impaired subjects that decreased after CN-NINM. A region of interest analysis indicated that CN-NINM may induce neuromodulation by increasing activity within the dorsal pons (p ≤ 0.01).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
Russia 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 80 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Engineering 10 11%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Psychology 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,133,185
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#57
of 1,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,560
of 94,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them