| Title |
A New Technique for Presentation of Scientific Works: Video in Poster
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-007-9446-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ali Dogan Bozdag |
| Abstract |
Presentations at scientific congresses and symposiums can be in two different forms: poster or oral presentation. Each method has some advantages and disadvantages. To combine the advantages of oral and poster presentations, a new presentation type was conceived: "video in poster." |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 67% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
| Psychology | 1 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2010.
All research outputs
#20,187,333
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,781
of 4,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,130
of 156,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#30
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.