↓ Skip to main content

Human Milk and the Nutritional Needs of Preterm Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Milk and the Nutritional Needs of Preterm Infants
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.049
Pubmed ID
Authors

David I. Tudehope

Abstract

Key principles underpinning feeding guidelines for preterm infants include support for developmental care, breastfeeding, milk expression, and creating feeding plans. Early trophic feeding with colostrum and transitional milk improves immune protection and promotes gut maturation. Studies of preterm infants demonstrate that feeding mother's milk (MM) decreases the incidence of infection and necrotizing enterocolitis and improves neurodevelopmental outcome but may decrease ponderal and linear growth. Standard practice in neonatal units is to promote mother's own milk as the feed of choice for all infants. However, it is not feasible or prudent to do so for all preterm infants. Mothers of preterm infants have lower rates of successful breastfeeding compared with those of term infants. MM can contain harmful bacterial or viral pathogens. Although preterm human milk (HM) contains higher concentrations of protein, sodium, zinc, and calcium than mature HM, it falls short of supplying adequate quantities of nutrients required by preterm infants. Therefore, HM supplemented with nutrients is recommended for all infants born before 32 weeks gestation and for certain infants born at 32-36 weeks of gestation. HM is the preferred feed, but preterm formula is an appropriate option when there is an inadequate supply of MM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 350 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 20%
Student > Bachelor 62 17%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 7%
Other 22 6%
Other 70 19%
Unknown 71 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 82 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#11,750
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,227
of 206,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#106
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.