↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Deletion of Neuronal PPARγ Enhances the Emotional Response to Acute Stress and Exacerbates Anxiety: An Effect Reversed by Rescue of Amygdala PPARγ Function

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Deletion of Neuronal PPARγ Enhances the Emotional Response to Acute Stress and Exacerbates Anxiety: An Effect Reversed by Rescue of Amygdala PPARγ Function
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, November 2016
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.4127-15.2016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esi Domi, Stefanie Uhrig, Laura Soverchia, Rainer Spanagel, Anita C. Hansson, Estelle Barbier, Markus Heilig, Roberto Ciccocioppo, Massimo Ubaldi

Abstract

PPARγ is one of the three isoforms of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs). PPARγ is activated by thiazolidinediones such as pioglitazone, and it is targeted to treat insulin resistance. PPARγ is densely expressed in brain areas involved in regulation of motivational and emotional processes.Here, we investigated the role of PPARγ in the brain and explored its role in anxiety and stress responses in mice. The results show that stimulation of PPARγ by pioglitazone did not affect basal anxiety but fully prevented the anxiogenic effect of acute stress. Using mice with genetic ablation of neuronal PPARγ (PPARγ(NestinCre)), we demonstrated that a lack of receptors, specifically in neurons, exacerbated basal anxiety and enhanced stress sensitivity. The administration of GW9662, a selective PPARγ antagonist, elicited a marked anxiogenic response in PPARγ wild-type (Wt) but not in PPARγ(NestinCre) KO mice. Using c-Fos immunohistochemistry we observed that acute stress exposure resulted in a different pattern of neuronal activation in the amygdala and the hippocampus of PPARγ(NestinCre) KO mice compared with Wt mice. No differences were found between Wt and KO mice in hypothalamic regions responsible for hormonal response to stress, nor in blood corticosterone levels. Microinjection of pioglitazone, into the amygdala but not into the hippocampus abolished the anxiogenic response elicited by acute stress. Results also showed that in both regions PPARγ co-localizes with GABAergic cells. These findings demonstrate that neuronal PPARγ is involved the regulation of the stress response, and that the amygdala is a key substrate for the anxiolytic effect of PPARγ. PPARγ is a classical target for antidiabetic therapies with thiazolidinedione compounds. PPARγ agonists, such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, are in clinical use for the treatment of insulin resistance. PPARγ has recently attracted attention for its involvement in the regulation of CNS immune response and functions. Here, we demonstrate that neuronal PPARγ activation prevented the negative emotional effects of stress and exerted anxiolytic actions without influencing HPA axis function. Conversely, pharmacological blockade or genetic deletion of PPARγ enhanced anxiogenic responses and increased vulnerability to stress. These effects appear to be controlled by PPARγ neuronal-mediated mechanisms in the amygdala.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,136,293
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#1,903
of 23,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,951
of 311,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#67
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.