↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Local and Distant Recurrence Patterns in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer According to Age

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Local and Distant Recurrence Patterns in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer According to Age
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2016
DOI 10.1245/s10434-016-5631-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia C. Radosa, Anne Eaton, Michelle Stempel, Amrin Khander, Cornelia Liedtke, Erich-Franz Solomayer, Maria Karsten, Melissa Pilewskie, Monica Morrow, Tari A. King

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype and young patient age are both associated with an increased risk of local recurrence (LR) and distant recurrence (DR). In young women with TNBC, it is unclear whether subtype or patient age is driving prognosis. Patients treated for primary TNBC from 1998 to 2011 were identified from the breast surgery database. Clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were compared between patients <40 and ≥40 years of age at diagnosis. Multivariate models were used to identify factors independently associated with LR and DR. Among 1930 patients with TNBC, 289 (15 %) were <40 and 1641 (85 %) were ≥40 years of age at diagnosis. Younger patients were more likely to present with higher stage disease and more likely to receive mastectomy (p < 0.01), axillary node dissection (p < 0.01), and chemotherapy (p < 0.01). At a median follow-up of 74 (0-201.1) months, there was no difference in LR or disease-free survival (DFS) by age group [5-year LR = 3.9 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.5-6.2) vs. 4.5 % (95 % CI 3.5-5.6) and 5-year DFS = 75.3 % (95 % CI 70.2-80.7) vs. 77.7 % (95 % CI 75.6-79.8), p = 0.94] in patients aged <40 and ≥40 years, respectively. On multivariate analysis, larger tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, and nodal positivity were associated with increased risk of DR. Age and type of surgery were not significantly associated with either outcome. Young age at diagnosis is not an independent risk factor for LR or DR in patients with TNBC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,598,838
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#258
of 7,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,422
of 320,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#7
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.