| Title |
A Seeded Sample of Concealed-Carry Permit Holders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Quantitative Criminology, December 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:joqc.0000005443.90669.4b |
| Authors |
Tom W. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 38% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#155
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,919
of 142,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them