| Title |
Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-016-2178-9 |
| Authors |
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Austria | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Librarian | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,334,290
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#212
of 2,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,851
of 318,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#7
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.