↓ Skip to main content

Criticism of trepidation models and advocacy of uniform precession in medieval Latin astronomy

Overview of attention for article published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Criticism of trepidation models and advocacy of uniform precession in medieval Latin astronomy
Published in
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00407-016-0184-1
Authors

C. Philipp E. Nothaft

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,661,332
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#74
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,325
of 312,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them