↓ Skip to main content

How should we assess knowledge translation in research organizations; designing a knowledge translation self-assessment tool for research institutes (SATORI)

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
How should we assess knowledge translation in research organizations; designing a knowledge translation self-assessment tool for research institutes (SATORI)
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-9-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaleh Gholami, Reza Majdzadeh, Saharnaz Nedjat, Sima Nedjat, Katayoun Maleki, Mahnaz Ashoorkhani, Bahareh Yazdizadeh

Abstract

The knowledge translation self-assessment tool for research institutes (SATORI) was designed to assess the status of knowledge translation in research institutes. The objective was, to identify the weaknesses and strengths of knowledge translation in research centres and faculties associated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Canada 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Master 13 14%
Other 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 31%
Social Sciences 17 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,367,758
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#832
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,092
of 107,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.