| Title |
Significance of the LD50-test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical substances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, April 1981
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00332351 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Zbinden, M. Flury-Roversi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 24% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,103,797
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#229
of 2,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312
of 7,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them