↓ Skip to main content

Mesodynamics in the SARS nucleocapsid measured by NMR field cycling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomolecular NMR, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 614)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Mesodynamics in the SARS nucleocapsid measured by NMR field cycling
Published in
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10858-009-9347-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael W. Clarkson, Ming Lei, Elan Z. Eisenmesser, Wladimir Labeikovsky, Alfred Redfield, Dorothee Kern

Abstract

Protein motions on all timescales faster than molecular tumbling are encoded in the spectral density. The dissection of complex protein dynamics is typically performed using relaxation rates determined at high and ultra-high field. Here we expand this range of the spectral density to low fields through field cycling using the nucleocapsid protein of the SARS coronavirus as a model system. The field-cycling approach enables site-specific measurements of R (1) at low fields with the sensitivity and resolution of a high-field magnet. These data, together with high-field relaxation and heteronuclear NOE, provide evidence for correlated rigid-body motions of the entire beta-hairpin, and corresponding motions of adjacent loops with a time constant of 0.8 ns (mesodynamics). MD simulations substantiate these findings and provide direct verification of the time scale and collective nature of these motions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Taiwan 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Librarian 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 21%
Chemistry 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,735,204
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#24
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,578
of 110,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.