↓ Skip to main content

Major Conservation Policy Issues for Biodiversity in Oceania

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Major Conservation Policy Issues for Biodiversity in Oceania
Published in
Conservation Biology, July 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01287.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. T. KINGSFORD, J. E. M. WATSON, C. J. LUNDQUIST, O. VENTER, L. HUGHES, E. L. JOHNSTON, J. ATHERTON, M. GAWEL, D. A. KEITH, B. G. MACKEY, C. MORLEY, H. P. POSSINGHAM, B. RAYNOR, H. F. RECHER, K. A. WILSON

Abstract

Oceania is a diverse region encompassing Australia, Melanesia, Micronesia, New Zealand, and Polynesia, and it contains six of the world's 39 hotspots of diversity. It has a poor record for extinctions, particularly for birds on islands and mammals. Major causes include habitat loss and degradation, invasive species, and overexploitation. We identified six major threatening processes (habitat loss and degradation, invasive species, climate change, overexploitation, pollution, and disease) based on a comprehensive review of the literature and for each developed a set of conservation policies. Many policies reflect the urgent need to deal with the effects of burgeoning human populations (expected to increase significantly in the region) on biodiversity. There is considerable difference in resources for conservation, including people and available scientific information, which are heavily biased toward more developed countries in Oceania. Most scientific publications analyzed for four threats (habitat loss, invasive species, overexploitation, and pollution) are from developed countries: 88.6% of Web of Science publications were from Australia (53.7%), New Zealand (24.3%), and Hawaiian Islands (10.5%). Many island states have limited resources or expertise. Even countries that do (e.g., Australia, New Zealand) have ongoing and emerging significant challenges, particularly with the interactive effects of climate change. Oceania will require the implementation of effective policies for conservation if the region's poor record on extinctions is not to continue.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 6 2%
United States 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Réunion 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Jersey 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 305 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 18%
Student > Master 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Other 14 4%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 42 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 120 37%
Environmental Science 110 34%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 53 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,623,874
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#919
of 4,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,015
of 122,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.