Title |
A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology Letters, October 2007
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01114.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Lindenmayer, Richard J. Hobbs, Rebecca Montague‐Drake, Jason Alexandra, Andrew Bennett, Mark Burgman, Peter Cale, Aram Calhoun, Viki Cramer, Peter Cullen, Don Driscoll, Lenore Fahrig, Joern Fischer, Jerry Franklin, Yrjo Haila, Malcolm Hunter, Philip Gibbons, Sam Lake, Gary Luck, Chris MacGregor, Sue McIntyre, Ralph Mac Nally, Adrian Manning, James Miller, Hal Mooney, Reed Noss, Hugh Possingham, Denis Saunders, Fiona Schmiegelow, Michael Scott, Dan Simberloff, Tom Sisk, Gary Tabor, Brian Walker, John Wiens, John Woinarski, Erika Zavaleta |
Abstract |
The management of landscapes for biological conservation and ecologically sustainable natural resource use are crucial global issues. Research for over two decades has resulted in a large literature, yet there is little consensus on the applicability or even the existence of general principles or broad considerations that could guide landscape conservation. We assess six major themes in the ecology and conservation of landscapes. We identify 13 important issues that need to be considered in developing approaches to landscape conservation. They include recognizing the importance of landscape mosaics (including the integration of terrestrial and aquatic areas), recognizing interactions between vegetation cover and vegetation configuration, using an appropriate landscape conceptual model, maintaining the capacity to recover from disturbance and managing landscapes in an adaptive framework. These considerations are influenced by landscape context, species assemblages and management goals and do not translate directly into on-the-ground management guidelines but they should be recognized by researchers and resource managers when developing guidelines for specific cases. Two crucial overarching issues are: (i) a clearly articulated vision for landscape conservation and (ii) quantifiable objectives that offer unambiguous signposts for measuring progress. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 50 | 2% |
Brazil | 37 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 12 | <1% |
Australia | 12 | <1% |
Canada | 11 | <1% |
South Africa | 8 | <1% |
Spain | 7 | <1% |
Mexico | 7 | <1% |
Colombia | 6 | <1% |
Other | 63 | 3% |
Unknown | 1793 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 479 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 390 | 19% |
Student > Master | 276 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 128 | 6% |
Other | 126 | 6% |
Other | 423 | 21% |
Unknown | 184 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 890 | 44% |
Environmental Science | 690 | 34% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 50 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 29 | 1% |
Engineering | 16 | <1% |
Other | 75 | 4% |
Unknown | 256 | 13% |