↓ Skip to main content

The Units of Selection Revisited: The Modules of Selection

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, April 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
The Units of Selection Revisited: The Modules of Selection
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, April 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1006682200831
Authors

Robert N. Brandon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 3 3%
Belgium 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 76 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 27%
Researcher 21 23%
Professor 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 47%
Philosophy 15 17%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Arts and Humanities 5 6%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 6 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,491,592
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#321
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,106
of 35,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.