↓ Skip to main content

Femur length, body mass, and stature estimates of Orrorin tugenensis, a 6 Ma hominid from Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Femur length, body mass, and stature estimates of Orrorin tugenensis, a 6 Ma hominid from Kenya
Published in
Primates, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10329-007-0040-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masato Nakatsukasa, Martin Pickford, Naoko Egi, Brigitte Senut

Abstract

To understand the palaeobiology of extinct hominids it is useful to estimate their body mass and stature. Although many species of early hominid are poorly preserved, it is occasionally possible to calculate these characteristics by comparison with different extant groups, by use of regression analysis. Calculated body masses and stature determined using these models can then be compared. This approach has been applied to 6 Ma hominid femoral remains from the Tugen Hills, Kenya, attributed to Orrorin tugenensis. It is suggested that the best-preserved young adult individual probably weighed approximately 35-50 kg. Another fragmentary femur results in larger estimates of body mass, indicative of individual variation. The length of the femur of the young adult individual was estimated, by using anthropoid-based regression, to be a minimum of 298 mm. Because whole-femur proportions for Orrorin are unknown, this prediction is conservative and should be revised when additional specimens become available. When this predicted value was used for regression analysis of bonobos and humans it was estimated to be 1.1-1.2 m tall. This value should, however, be viewed as a lower limit.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 3 3%
Nepal 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 79 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 10 12%
Professor 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 38%
Social Sciences 19 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 13%
Arts and Humanities 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2008.
All research outputs
#3,258,194
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#232
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,565
of 76,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.