| Title |
Historical and future anthropogenic emission pathways derived from coupled climate–carbon cycle simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-010-9886-6 |
| Authors |
Erich Roeckner, M. A. Giorgetta, T. Crueger, M. Esch, Julia Pongratz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 38% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,872,517
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,275
of 5,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,694
of 94,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.