↓ Skip to main content

Neuroimaging in children, adolescents and young adults with psychological trauma

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Neuroimaging in children, adolescents and young adults with psychological trauma
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00787-013-0410-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirjam A. W. Rinne-Albers, Nic J. A. van der Wee, Francien Lamers-Winkelman, Robert R. J. M. Vermeiren

Abstract

Childhood psychological trauma is a strong predictor of psychopathology. Preclinical research points to the influence of this type of trauma on brain development. However, the effects of psychological trauma on the developing human brain are less known and a challenging question is whether the effects can be reversed or even prevented. The aim of this review is to give an overview of neuroimaging studies in traumatized juveniles and young adults up till 2012. Neuroimaging studies in children and adolescents with traumatic experiences were found to be scarce. Most studies were performed by a small number of research groups in the United States and examined structural abnormalities. The reduction in hippocampal volume reported in adults with PTSD could not be confirmed in juveniles. The most consistent finding in children and adolescents, who experienced psychological trauma are structural abnormalities of the corpus callosum. We could not identify any studies investigating treatment effects. Neuroimaging studies in traumatized children and adolescents clearly lag behind studies in traumatized adults as well as studies on ADHD and autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 216 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 42%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 51 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,749,981
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1,159
of 1,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,977
of 199,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.