| Title |
Ella Thea Smith and the Lost History of American High School Biology Textbooks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the History of Biology, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10739-007-9139-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald P. Ladouceur |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 27% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#646,335
of 23,392,375 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#4
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#914
of 68,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,392,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them