| Title |
Constraints on group size in primates and carnivores: population density and day-range as assays of exploitation competition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00173778 |
| Authors |
R.W. Wrangham, J.L. Gittleman, C.A. Chapman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 300 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 27% |
| Researcher | 71 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 187 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Psychology | 13 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,389
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,041
of 20,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.