↓ Skip to main content

Melatonin Versus Placebo in Children with Autism Spectrum Conditions and Severe Sleep Problems Not Amenable to Behaviour Management Strategies: A Randomised Controlled Crossover Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Melatonin Versus Placebo in Children with Autism Spectrum Conditions and Severe Sleep Problems Not Amenable to Behaviour Management Strategies: A Randomised Controlled Crossover Trial
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10803-010-1036-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry Wright, David Sims, Siobhan Smart, Ahmed Alwazeer, Ben Alderson-Day, Victoria Allgar, Clare Whitton, Heather Tomlinson, Sophie Bennett, Jenni Jardine, Nicola McCaffrey, Charlotte Leyland, Christine Jakeman, Jeremy Miles

Abstract

Twenty-two children with autism spectrum disorders who had not responded to supported behaviour management strategies for severe dysomnias entered a double blind, randomised, controlled crossover trial involving 3 months of placebo versus 3 months of melatonin to a maximum dose of 10 mg. 17 children completed the study. There were no significant differences between sleep variables at baseline. Melatonin significantly improved sleep latency (by an average of 47 min) and total sleep (by an average of 52 min) compared to placebo, but not number of night wakenings. The side effect profile was low and not significantly different between the two arms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 18 8%
Other 49 21%
Unknown 61 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 25%
Psychology 32 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 73 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,523,389
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#635
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,997
of 98,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.