↓ Skip to main content

Morphological Features in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Matched Case–Control Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
59 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Morphological Features in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Matched Case–Control Study
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10803-010-1018-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heval Ozgen, Gerhard S. Hellemann, Rebecca K. Stellato, Bertine Lahuis, Emma van Daalen, Wouter G. Staal, Marije Rozendal, Raoul C. Hennekam, Frits A. Beemer, Herman van Engeland

Abstract

This study was designed to examine morphological features in a large group of children with autism spectrum disorder versus normal controls. Amongst 421 patients and 1,007 controls, 224 matched pairs were created. Prevalence rates and odds ratios were analyzed by conditional regression analysis, McNemar test or paired t-test matched pairs. Morphological abnormalities were significantly more prevalent in patients with autism than in the normal control group and 48 morphological features distinguished patients from controls. Our findings show that morphological features are associated with autism. Exploring potential underlying genetic mechanisms of this association might lead to a better understanding of autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 33%
Psychology 8 9%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Engineering 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#738,830
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#218
of 5,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,012
of 104,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.