↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric comparison of PHQ-9 and HADS for measuring depression severity in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
445 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
532 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychometric comparison of PHQ-9 and HADS for measuring depression severity in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2008
DOI 10.3399/bjgp08x263794
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isobel M Cameron, John R Crawford, Kenneth Lawton, Ian C Reid

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 532 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 515 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 56 11%
Student > Bachelor 56 11%
Researcher 52 10%
Other 103 19%
Unknown 111 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 169 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 120 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 7%
Social Sciences 20 4%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 55 10%
Unknown 123 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,794,061
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#898
of 4,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,503
of 156,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.