↓ Skip to main content

Identifying novel peroxisomal proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying novel peroxisomal proteins
Published in
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/prot.21420
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Hawkins, Donna Mahony, Stefan Maetschke, Mark Wakabayashi, Rohan D. Teasdale, Mikael Bodén

Abstract

Peroxisomes are small subcellular compartments responsible for a range of essential metabolic processes. Efforts in predicting peroxisomal protein import are challenged by species variation and sparse sequence data sets with experimentally confirmed localization. We present a predictor of peroxisomal import based on the presence of the dominant peroxisomal targeting signal one (PTS1), a seemingly wellconserved but highly unspecific motif. The signal appears to rely on subtle dependencies with the preceding residues. We evaluate prediction accuracies against two alternative predictor services, PEROXIP and the PTS1 PREDICTOR. We test the integrity of prediction on a range of prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteomes lacking peroxisomes. Similarly we test the accuracy on peroxisomal proteins known to not overlap with training data. The model identified a number of proteins within the RIKEN IPS7 mouse protein dataset as potentially novel peroxisomal proteins. Three were confirmed in vitro using immunofluorescent detection of myc-epitope-tagged proteins in transiently transfected BHK-21 cells (Dhrs2, Serhl, and Ehhadh). The final model has a superior specificity to both alternatives, and an accuracy better than PEROXIP and on par with PTS1 PREDICTOR. Thus, the model we present should prove invaluable for labeling PTS1 targeted proteins with high confidence. We use the predictor to screen several additional eukaryotic genomes to revise previously estimated numbers of peroxisomal proteins. Available at http://pprowler.itee.uq.edu.au.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Netherlands 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Greece 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 21 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 35%
Researcher 6 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2010.
All research outputs
#6,744,632
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
#777
of 3,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,267
of 78,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,332 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.