↓ Skip to main content

Physical activity, sedentary time and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomisation study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Physical activity, sedentary time and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomisation study
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2022
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne C Dixon-Suen, Sarah J Lewis, Richard M Martin, Dallas R English, Terry Boyle, Graham G Giles, Kyriaki Michailidou, Manjeet K Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Michael Lush, ABCTB Investigators, Thomas U Ahearn, Christine B Ambrosone, Irene L Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Volker Arndt, Kristan J Aronson, Annelie Augustinsson, Päivi Auvinen, Laura E Beane Freeman, Heiko Becher, Matthias W Beckmann, Sabine Behrens, Marina Bermisheva, Carl Blomqvist, Natalia V Bogdanova, Stig E Bojesen, Bernardo Bonanni, Hermann Brenner, Thomas Brüning, Saundra S Buys, Nicola J Camp, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Jose E Castelao, Melissa H Cessna, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J Chanock, Christine L Clarke, Don M Conroy, Fergus J Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S Cross, Kamila Czene, Mary B Daly, Peter Devilee, Thilo Dörk, Miriam Dwek, Diana M Eccles, A. Heather Eliassen, Christoph Engel, Mikael Eriksson, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A Fasching, Olivia Fletcher, Henrik Flyger, Lin Fritschi, Marike Gabrielson, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Montserrat García-Closas, José A García-Sáenz, Mark S Goldberg, Pascal Guénel, Melanie Gündert, Eric Hahnen, Christopher A Haiman, Lothar Häberle, Niclas Håkansson, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Steven N Hart, Michelle Harvie, Peter Hillemanns, Antoinette Hollestelle, Maartje J Hooning, Reiner Hoppe, John Hopper, Anthony Howell, David J Hunter, Anna Jakubowska, Wolfgang Janni, Esther M John, Audrey Jung, Rudolf Kaaks, Renske Keeman, Cari M Kitahara, Stella Koutros, Peter Kraft, Vessela N Kristensen, Katerina Kubelka-Sabit, Allison W Kurian, James V Lacey, Diether Lambrechts, Loic Le Marchand, Annika Lindblom, Sibylle Loibl, Jan Lubiński, Arto Mannermaa, Mehdi Manoochehri, Sara Margolin, Maria Elena Martinez, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Usha Menon, Anna Marie Mulligan, Rachel A Murphy, NBCS Collaborators, Heli Nevanlinna, Ines Nevelsteen, William G Newman, Kenneth Offit, Andrew F Olshan, Håkan Olsson, Nick Orr, Alpa Patel, Julian Peto, Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Nadege Presneau, Brigitte Rack, Paolo Radice, Erika Rees-Punia, Gad Rennert, Hedy S Rennert, Atocha Romero, Emmanouil Saloustros, Dale P Sandler, Marjanka K Schmidt, Rita K Schmutzler, Lukas Schwentner, Christopher Scott, Mitul Shah, Xiao-Ou Shu, Jacques Simard, Melissa C Southey, Jennifer Stone, Harald Surowy, Anthony J Swerdlow, Rulla M Tamimi, William J Tapper, Jack A Taylor, Mary Beth Terry, Rob A E M Tollenaar, Melissa A Troester, Thérèse Truong, Michael Untch, Celine M Vachon, Vijai Joseph, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Clarice R Weinberg, Alicja Wolk, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Alison M Dunning, Paul D P Pharoah, Douglas F Easton, Roger L Milne, Brigid M Lynch

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 10%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 8 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 100 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 106 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 722. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2026.
All research outputs
#35,627
of 34,622,316 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#117
of 7,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,017
of 458,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#7
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,622,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.