| Title |
Reticulate phylogeny of gastropod-shell-breeding cichlids from Lake Tanganyika – the result of repeated introgressive hybridization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-7-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephan Koblmüller, Nina Duftner, Kristina M Sefc, Mitsuto Aibara, Martina Stipacek, Michel Blanc, Bernd Egger, Christian Sturmbauer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 70% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,610,842
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#670
of 3,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,254
of 178,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.