| Title |
Writing method and productivity of science and engineering faculty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research in Higher Education, June 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00991488 |
| Authors |
Ronald T. Kellogg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 31% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 15% |
| Psychology | 2 | 15% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2008.
All research outputs
#6,596,988
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Research in Higher Education
#302
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,692
of 10,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Higher Education
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them